Sunday, 30 March 2014


Consider, Research and Discuss the Conventions of Character, Archetype and Cliché in Illustrations

Illustrations, comics, political cartoons and graphic novels use a variety of visual codes and sign systems to communicate complex narratives and situations. These situations can range from economy and minimalism, anthropomorphism and graphic symbolism. In this essay I will be looking at different methods of describing and visualising character and archetype and what the word ‘cliché’ means.
            What is Character and Archetype? “Central story patterns of archetypes stretching back to the earliest myths and folk tales underline each character role. Like members of an Olympian pantheon or Tarot deck, characters all have countless aspects and hybrids of archetypes abound. The classic or mythic hero, the one who saves the day, fights the monsters and restores order from chaos- is the most recognizable archetype, as the heroes quest is present across all human cultures.” [1] Character and archetypes are a recurring character type that appears in all literature. Comic books and graphic novels are no exception to these patterns and actually have an advantage compared to novels or short stories. They are able to enhance and tell stories through visual means, often without any text or speech bubbles. “Comics are a medium of action rather than words, and it has been said that you can get a better understanding of a character’s personality by paying attention to their actions rather than their words.” [2] These archetypes can range from the hero, villain, antihero, the boss, the geek, the trickster, the foil and the shepherd and can also be defined by clothing and setting. Original pattern of which all other similar persons, objects, or concepts are derived, copied, modelled, or emulated.”[3]
          
  The most popular type of comic books is unquestionably the superhero comic. Superhero comics started arguably around 1933 with the arrival of Superman and the start of the golden age of comics, and set the anchors for all archetypes that followed. Superman was a genuine hero down to his core and this was amplified by his overall appearance. He’s tall, handsome and has a huge physique. A superhero needs a variety of different strengths, most obviously being physical power. He has to be able to beat the bad guys in a fight and save the good guys from a disaster. Superman’s appearance suggests straight away that he fits the bill. As you can see in the first image here, he has a warm, welcoming smile on his face suggesting to the reader that he’s the good guy, he is someone you can trust and someone who will lend a helping hand (which he does time and time again). He has been modelled as a classic hero archetype.
Captain America is another classic hero trope. Unlike Superman, who was born with all the power he possesses, Steve Rogers gained his powers through a scientific experiment. During the experiment his doctor was shot and killed which led Rogers to have a guiding moral compass and use his powers for good. But you don’t need to know the story to realise that he is the “good guy”, his costume is probably the biggest giveaway. Its based clearly on the American flag, the star spangled banner. “Iconographically, almost all superheroes are good looking and muscular, and wear costumes that emphasize the fact.” [4] The United States of America is a country who first and foremost pride them selves on freedom and Captain America was created during World War II, so its obvious as to why they choose the stars and stripes. His costume is a symbol to the American people for hope and perseverance. He does share similar attributes to Superman though; he’s tall, handsome and very muscular with a strong jaw line. Another classic superhero.
There are literally hundreds of superheroes in many different comic strips and graphic novels, mostly modified versions of the classic hero archetype, but not all look like Superman and Steve Rogers. “There are obvious exceptions – Ben Grimm of the Fantastic Four is not any less a superhero for looking like a pile of orange rocks”[5] If an idea or expression is overused it runs the risk of
becoming a cliché, and also a parody of itself. Ben Grimm, or The Thing’s, appearance does not conform to the traditional look of a superhero; he doesn’t even look like a normal human being. Ben Grimm’s appearance was made to break the norm, show that heroes don’t have to be good looking and handsome. He does however still possess’ superhuman strength, and is actually bigger then Clark Kent or Steve Rogers who, even though they have muscle, are quite slender and lean. The other main difference from the first two is The Thing cannot change his body. He bares the curse of having to constantly look like a pile of rocks. So even though he still fights the good fight and protects the innocent, his appearance does not fall into the category of a cliché. He breaks the mould.
            A question that is debated in depth and fairly often is, ‘why are superheroes good?’ It’s not enough to just say these are the good guys and they will do good things, their needs to be some underline reason and have an existential reason for the characters actions. The struggle between good and evil tends to take the form of violent or inner struggle, because that is the way that, since the beginning, comics have chosen to stylize moral contention. “The question as to whether people love justice, or goodness, for its own sake or merely because they realize that if they are unjust, or immoral, they will suffer negative consequences.” [6] Daredevil is a blind Marvel superhero that has the nickname ‘the Man Without Fear’. He has also been portrayed as a member of the Catholic Church, although a troubled and often conflicted one. This is relevant to what he does as a costumed crime fighter because it’s what guides him and gives him moral principals. But is religious faith a form of strength or weakness? Is it help or a hindrance? With all the powers that these superheroes posses, they can do so much good but equally do so much harm and destruction. Matt Murdock’s faith influences his attitudes and his actions, and is a source of inner strength and guidance. “Critics of the genre often assume, wrongly, that it pays no attention to the ethical issue at its core, whereas in fact it is obsessed with it almost to the point of cliché” [7] When superhero genre first started to appear that might have been the case, but Daredevil doesn’t comply to that cliché and the ethical issues are definitely a driving force for the character.
            “The antihero is arguably a melding of the classic hero pattern with a more cynical modern perception of human complexity and weakness.”[8]. In 1986 Alan Moore and artist Dave Gibbons published a 12-issue mini-series called “Watchmen” which was thought of, as Roz Kaveney puts it, the superhero comic that deconstructed the whole idea and made superhero comics redundant thereafter. [9] Moore exemplifies increasingly common character types, granting them a sense of nobility to clearly conflicted protagonists. Moore didn’t want to create just another superhero ensemble book feeling they were becoming conventional and clichéd.
One way that watchmen forces us to rethink the superhero is by portraying several costumed crime-fighters as psychologically troubled. One of the protagonists in Watchmen, Rorschach, is a psychologically maladjusted antihero who had been traumatized in his childhood. Now because of this, Walter Kovacs (Rorschach) chooses to don an inkblot mask that constantly changes and moves around depending on his mood. Keeping in tone with the comics, Rorschach’s chosen costume is this noir, 1930’s looking suit instead of a clichéd, out-dated superhero costume with a cape. This immediately distinguishes him from his colleagues and predecessors, who all wear costumes that amplify their name and personalities, such as ‘Nite Owl’ who’s costume is based on the look of an owl. Another good example of the antihero from Watchmen is the character, ‘The Comedian’.  This is another superhero that is thuggish and sadistic. He has a twisted sense of humour, he is neurotic, and has little regard for social conventions or human life. Despite all of this, he is depicted as a patriotic symbol and is not the villain. The villain of ‘Watchman’ is in fact the supposed superhero – and Watchmen member – Ozymandias.
The character of the villain (or antagonist) is iconically an evil man or woman who has a grand master plan for personal gain, and is usually foiled by the protagonist. Many of the opponents of the superheroes are as powerful as the hero but lack a moral compass or have specifically chosen evil. Protagonists have a moral code that usually states to do no harm, while the antagonists simply disregard any code such as this. Antagonists are usually as strong or stronger than the hero. They would also have their own costume or suit that would mirror the heroes in some way or it would be a way to showcase a part of their characteristics. A quick example of this would be Lex Luthor from the Superman comic, who wears a suit to give off a sense of authority, or the Green Goblin from the Spiderman comics who’s costume is designed to give the look of a crazed man gone over the edge. Ozymandias once again breaks the tired old cliché about super villains. He was a superhero but when the Watchmen hung up their capes and cowls, he turned businessman, entrepreneur. This leads to Ozymandias creating and successfully executing an elaborate plan to stop the annihilation of all human life, which leads to all nations at war to a peaceful collaboration against a new common enemy which is an alien invasion, set up by Ozymandias himself. Veidt, his real name, is the cause of three million deaths when his plan succeeds. “The way of thinking employed by Ozymandias, the deaths of even many more people could be justified in the name of saving billions of other lives and ending war between nations.” [10] This brings up the question; does the end justify the means? Aeon J. Skoble says that, his actions are to bring about a stronger, more loving world, which he is convinced, is the right thing to do, and his actions are tremendously effective, but is irrational and insane? And is it necessary? [11] Has this man become a monster or is he just a misunderstood hero?
One of the more recognised villains in the comic book universe would be The Joker, created by Bob Kane and Jerry Robinson in 1940 and was the nemesis for the superhero/vigilante, Batman. The Joker is a sadistic, psychopathic man who breaks the normal conventions of the villain archetype and has been a major influence on characters in the last century. What separates him from traditional villains is that he doesn’t have any goals for personal gain like money or power, have any abnormal physical strength, or wears a costume that would in some way protect him. He’s just sadistic and is obsessed with murder and suffering. He is a worthy opponent for Batman because he will always loose in a physical embrace but can triumph when it comes to inflicting mental distress on Bruce Wayne. He wears a cheap looking purple suit which enforces his personality of being a crazed mad man because its not a suit of armour, its there for comedic relief and to emphasize the fact.
            Another type of archetype is the Foil. This is a character that is usually written to highlight another characters traits, usually the protagonists. A good example of this was would be Asterix and Obelix. Asterix is the protagonist while Obelix is the foil and in some ways his sidekick. Another example of this, in the comic universe, would be Batman and Robin. Dick Grayson is Bruce Wayne’s sidekick, or foil. Bob Kane created batman in May 1939 and Robin was first featured just over a year later in April 1940. The choice of Batman’s costume was a simple matter of choosing something that would scare the cowardly superstitious criminals, and strike fear into his enemies, so Kane went with a very dark and brooding costume, that turned into something more, a symbol. Grayson’s costume was ultimately very different from Wayne’s, probably because he was at the time still a young boy, but also because the heroic outlaw Robin Hood was an inspiration for the character. The image I
have chosen here depicts the two characters together and the differences are obvious. The artist, Jerry Robinson, was able to capture the youthfulness of Dick Grayson by giving him a smaller physique, while still making him believable as a caped crusader by making him a little leaner. If he were as big as Batman then the readers wouldn’t buy the fact that he’s still a boy, not a strong, tall man.


  
Another way comic book writers and artists were able to break the clichés of written characters and archetypes were the way they wrote female characters. The ‘Golden Age of Comics’ was going on at the same time as the Second World War. Men had gone overseas to serve their country and the women were left to take care of their homes and family. In the face of feminist progression, more women in leading and heroic roles were needed as a way for women to feel empowered in a very male dominated world. One of the first notable female superheroes is the DC character Wonder Woman, first appearing in December 1941. Like all superheroes at the time, Wonder Woman fought for truth, justice and peace and was soon considered as a feminist icon. Like Marvel’s big name character Captain America, she dons a star spangled costume, which involves a short skirt showing off just how toned she is and how physically strong she is. The comic showed that it wasn’t just men who could be strong and powerful but women could too and they needed to be heard. Eventually, like all comic book series’, different writers came in and inevitably change certain characteristics of Diana Prince. They wrote storylines that involved more domestic issues and romance, and the look of the character herself was more hyper sexualized. This caused some controversy because Wonder Woman was meant to empower women, not play to male orientated fantasies.
                 With the rise and popularity of Wonder Woman more and more female superheroes were being created. This counterbalanced the playing field in an otherwise male orientated universe. Marvel was particularly strict about writing and drawing heroin’s and one comic book series that stands out is the X-Men. A team up comic featuring the likes of Rouge, Scarlet Which, Jean Grey and Storm to name but a few. These characters were all written in some way as psychologically damaged with, to a certain degree, trust issues. Ororo Munroe (Storm) is a black superhero that is intelligent, loyal and very powerful, she is able to fly and control the weather. She lives in a world where the human population hate mutants yet she still fights for the good of humanity. This makes her very noble and a true hero. The physical appearance of Storm is very toned and muscular yet is covered up by a white costume and with a cape that also looks like wings. So not only is she not over sexualised, she also wears a costume that has a function.
In conclusion, I feel that the world of comic books and graphic novels is a broad one that cannot be defined by one genre or sub genre. Over the years characters and story lines have become denser and always changing so they don’t become clichéd, stereotypical or a parody of itself. They also mould themselves to world events, politics and culture to keep it fresh and the audience entertained. Characters that were created 60-70 years ago feel just as current today as they would have done then because the writers, and more importantly the artists, keep them three dimensional and relatable.



 References

1.     “Character Design for Graphic Novels” by Steven Withrow and Alexander Danner page 22 published 2007
2.     “How to Draw and Sell Comic Strips” by Alan McKenzie page 82 published 2005
4.     Superheroes! Capes and Crusaders in Comic and Film” by Roz Kaveney page 10 published 2008
5.     Superheroes! Capes and Crusaders in Comic and Film” by Roz Kaveney page 10 published 2008
6.     “Philosophy of Comics” by C. Stephen Evans page 121 Published 1996
7.     “Graphic Story Telling and Visual Narrative” by Will Eisner
8.     Superheroes! Capes and Crusaders in Comic and Film” by Roz Kaveney page 23 published 2008
9.     Superheroes! Capes and Crusaders in Comic and Film” by Roz Kaveney page 120 published 2008
10.  Superheroes and Philosophy – Truth, Justice, and the Socratic Way” by Tom Morris and Matt Morris page 36 published 2005
11.  Superheroes and Philosophy – Truth, Justice, and the Socratic Way” by Tom Morris and Matt Morris page 37 published 2005








No comments:

Post a Comment